Code review (sometimes referred to as peer review) is a software quality assurance activity in which one or several people check a program mainly by viewing and reading parts of its source code, and they do so after implementation or as an interruption of implementation.

This guide contains advice and best practices for performing code review, and having your code reviewed. All merge requests for GitLab CE and EE, whether written by a GitLab team member or a wider community member, must go through a code review process to ensure the code is effective, understandable, maintainable, and secure.

For example, you can run a code linter to scan your code along with a language linter to scan your documentation, or you can use a standalone tool along with CodeClimate-based scanning. Code Quality combines all of the reports so you see all of them when you view results .

Sep 14, 2023 · To export your vulnerability reports to HTML or PDF, head to the Custom Vulnerability Reporting project. This project contains a script that queries a project's vulnerability report, and then generates an HTML file from that data.

I've been doing code reviews in Gitlab for over two months with almost no friction. I've setup rss2email to send email notifications everytime a developer pushes new commits. Then I use Gitlab's comment feature for commits to make some comments about the pushed code.

Mar 17, 2017 · Our code review tools were built with the aim of enhancing your review process, taking you from idea to production while setting new personal records for code delivery speed and quality. Demo Typical flow

Let's look at two examples: First, L A T E X source code for a textbook on GitHub, second JaaScriptv code used in my presentations on GitLab. 2 Collaboration on OER extbook on GitHub

Sample Secure Code Review Report. 1. The Code Review Process A Secure Code Review is a specialized task with the goal of identifying types of weaknesses that exist within a given code base. The task involves both manual and automated review of the underlying source code and identifies specific issues that may be representative of broader ...

As soon as you have code to review, have the code reviewed by a reviewer. This reviewer can be from your group or team, or a domain expert. The reviewer can: Give you a second opinion on the chosen solution and implementation. Help look for bugs, …

In this post we’re laying out 11 rules for the GitLab Workflow, to help simplify and clean it up. The major benefit of the rules (or so we hope) is that it simplifies the process and produces a more eficient and cleaner outcome. We think there’s always room for improvement, and everything is a draft. As always, everyone can contribute!