Marbury v. Madison, the case that established the courts' power to review the law, explained
In 1803, Chief Justice John Marshall first expressed the principle that while Congress makes the laws and the president ...
What Marbury v. Madison means for the Supreme Court — and America
President Donald Trump has been critical of federal judges who've moved to block some of his most contentious actions, such ...
The Daily Record (Maryland)2dOpinion
Trump might test Marbury v. Madison, the case that established the courts’ power to review the law
President Donald Trump may be headed to a test of a foundational case in American constitutional law, Marbury v. Madison.
Time29d
When Political History Happens Over Dinner
Consider a dinner that outgoing president John Adams had with his newly almost-Chief Justice ... Certainly Marshall’s most important decision, in Marbury v. Madison confirming the authority ...
The New York Times6d
Trump’s Actions Have Created a Constitutional Crisis, Scholars Say
Law professors have long debated what the term means. But now many have concluded that the nation faces a reckoning as President Trump tests the boundaries of executive power. By Adam Liptak ...
WLRN26d
Chief Justice Roberts is no stranger to administering the oath of office
Chief Justice John Marshall — during his record 34 years in that role — administered the oath of office nine times to five presidents, from Thomas Jefferson in 1801 to Andrew Jackson in 1833.
Fox News27d
Trump gets inaugurated Monday; here's how the Supreme Court swears in new presidents
The man who handled the duties more than 200 years ago was John Marshall, widely acknowledged as the most influential chief justice in U.S ... private vote in Clinton v. Jones.
Post and Courier15d
Scoppe: How SC's new chief justice is making courts more open, efficient and graceful
When I first talked with S.C. Chief Justice John Kittredge in August, the thing that impressed me most was that he said he wanted to talk again in six months so I could hold him to account.