All of Maine's federal judges have recused themselves from the case involving Rep. Laurel Libby suing the state's speaker of the house over her recent censure.
Janet Mills (D) in response to Trump’s threat ... Two important Supreme Court cases provide some guidance. In South Dakota v. Dole, the court held that Congress could withhold up to 10 percent ...
The Department of Health and Human Services made the referral just four days after initiating an investigation into the state. But federal investigators never contacted either the governor's office of ...
The decision, dated Feb. 25, came just days after the administration announced its investigation and does not appear to be ...
The Trump administration's Health and Human Services Department is expanding its Title IX probe into transgender sports participation in Maine to include the state's primary governing body for high ...
HHS said it has referred the case to the U.S. Department ... He clashed publicly with Gov. Janet Mills during a meeting of governors last month over her refusal to comply with his order, with Mills ...
Ms. Greenhouse, the recipient of a 1998 Pulitzer Prize, reported on the Supreme Court for The Times from 1978 to 2008 and was a contributing Opinion writer from 2009 to 2021. While the country ...
HHS sent the violation notice four days after a public spat between Gov. Janet Mills (D-ME) and Donald Trump prompted a federal investigation into her state.
Janet Mills (D-ME ... After the president threatened to pull federal funding from the state, Mills responded, “See you in court.” The violation notice listed more than $500,000 of funding ...
Janet Mills has taken a completely different ... Maine if it didn’t toe the line on trans sports, Gov. Mills said, “See you in court.” Given that, at her Senate confirmation hearing, Justice ...
An image featured in a video shared on Instagram claims to show Maine Democratic Gov. Janet Mills allegedly being arrested. A content detection scan using the website “Hive Moderation ...
Had Dellinger’s case been fully litigated, it may have offered the Supreme Court an opportunity to revisit Humphrey’s Executor, particularly in light of more recent rulings such as Seila Law v.