Thus, the first five years of the Nineteenth Century saw a strong foundation set for judicial independence. I believe this is what our chief justice was referring to when he spoke of over 200 years of ...

Following court orders allows expectations to be set, disputes to be resolved, decisions to be honored, and litigants to move ...

The most important question in American politics today is whether Donald Trump will respect court orders. Judges have ruled against his administration repeatedly. But will he listen? In America the ...

Donald Trump greets US Supreme Court Chief Justice John Roberts on his way to address ... student learns about in law school: 1803’s Marbury v. Madison. At issue in that case were commissions ...

In another case, a challenge to Trump’s order restricting birthright citizenship, the Court set a briefing schedule so ...

Firmly established in 1803 with Marbury v. Madison, the idea of judicial ... As part of the decision, Chief Justice John Marshall wrote, “It is emphatically the province and duty of the judicial ...

In the seminal Supreme Court case, Marbury v. Madison (1803), Chief Justice John Marshall, writing for the court, said that the judiciary branch of the government says what the law is.

As Chief Justice John Marshall explained almost 225 years ago in the seminal case of Marbury v. Madison, “It is emphatically the province and duty of the judicial department to say what the law ...

Roberts is taking his cues from another Chief Justice, John Marshall ... law student learns about in law school: 1803’s Marbury v. Madison. At issue in that case were commissions (new posts ...