Embedded C developers shy away from C++ out of concern for performance. The class construct is one of their main concerns. My previous article Code Craft – Embedding C++: Classes explored ...

Rip away the class stuff and it works fine, just like any other function pointer ... BR><BR>I always wanted C++ to a great combination of my two favorite languages, C and Java, but the syntax ...

It actually isn't, because in C++ you must distinguish the declaration of classes, structs and functions from their definition. A class declaration is the minimum amount of information other types ...

The C++ spec doesn't even require the implementation to use a vtable AFAIK. With that behind, how hard is it to dump the binary representation of a class and figure out where the pointer is?

C++ programming has emerged as a dominant programming language, and the newly formed class is geared toward teaching students enough computer science and C++ programming to pass advanced-placement ...

Also, TrapC reuses a few code safety features from C++, notably member functions, constructors, destructors, and the new keyword. TrapC is not the only attempt to deal with memory safety in C or C++.

And there's growing interest in Rust as a replacement for C and C++ in systems ... an unsafe memory management function to accomplish certain tasks. As a result, classes or functions are available ...

It may be useful to think in terms of data memory in C and C++ as being divided into three separate spaces: Static memory. This is where variables, which are defined outside of functions, are located.