Justice Kagan's opinion in Royal Canin U. S. A. v. Wullschleger was such a joy to read, and a reminder of how good of a CivPro professor she must have been. Here are the facts. A case was filed ...
Therefore, Kagan had a duty to recuse under section 455(b)(3). (Kagan, it seems, minimized her participation in the Obamacare litigation in order to enhance her viability as a Supreme Court candidate.
Results that may be inaccessible to you are currently showing.
Hide inaccessible results
Feedback