Companies had sued the FDA, saying it unfairly shifted its standards for approving e-cigarette liquids popular with teens.
17hon MSN
Justice Samuel Alito wrote that the court "cannot say that the FDA improperly changed its position."Start the day smarter.
The U.S. Supreme Court on Wednesday upheld an FDA decision that rejected a series of applications to market fruit-flavored ...
The US Supreme Court ruled unanimously Wednesday that health authorities acted properly when they blocked e-cigarette ...
A unanimous Supreme Court on Wednesday overturned a lower court ruling and found the Food and Drug Administration acted ...
The Supreme Court ruled unanimously Wednesday that the FDA properly refused to approve flavored vape products by two e-cigarette companies because regulators determined they were too great a risk to ...
WASHINGTON (AP) — The Supreme Court on Wednesday ruled for the Food and Drug Administration in its crackdown on ...
The Supreme Court backed the FDA's refusal to authorize the sale of kid-friendly flavored vapes, including the flavors ...
"[W]e conclude that the FDA’s denial orders were sufficiently consistent with its predecisional guidance and thus did not run afoul of the change-in-position doctrine," Justice Samuel Alito Jr. wrote ...
The U.S. Supreme Court threw out on Wednesday a judicial decision that found the U.S. Food and Drug Administration acted ...
The justices handed a win, for now, to the Food and Drug Administration in its rejection of applications from makers of ...
The Supreme Court upheld an FDA decision to halt authorization for two companies to sell flavored e-cigarettes, a win to ...
Some results have been hidden because they may be inaccessible to you
Show inaccessible results