News
It's clear all those cores and threads are being utilized and it offers huge performance gains over Intel's Core i9-7980XE. It was a third quicker in POV-Ray with a similar advantage once ...
Core i9-7980XE (18 cores, 36 threads): 2.6GHz; Boost, 4.2GHz to 4.4 GHz Core i9-7960X (16 cores, 32 threads): 2.8GHz; Boost, 4.2GHz to 4.4 GHz Core i9-7940X 14 cores, 28 threads: 3.1GHz ...
The diagram below, which was taken from the ... as Moore's Law gives us ever more threads and cores per processor die.
Hosted on MSN1mon
64-core Ryzen Threadripper 9985WX spotted in shipping manifests — 16- and 12-core siblings also spottedwe can infer the flagship will offer up to 96 cores / 192 threads (12 CCDs). This would also mean a total of 384MB of L3 cache (32MB per CCD) and 96MB of L2 cache (1MB per core). There's a usual ...
If you use the overly simplistic metric of dollar per thread, Intel actually has an advantage in a Core i9 vs Threadripper price match. Of course, from AMD’s point of view, it probably thinks ...
Intel’s new Core i9-14900K is a tough processor to evaluate. It brings the same number of cores and the same architecture as last-gen’s Core i9-13900K, but Intel asserts that the new chip ...
AMD, on the other hand, uses one core design across the entire CPU. The advantage for Intel is that it’s able to offer a far greater number of threads to applications that can take advantage of ...
The new Core i9-14901KE, Core i9-14901E, and Core i7-14701E processors are all 8 cores and 16 threads (8 P-Cores, 0 E-Cores) with maximum boost CPU clocks of 5.8GHz, 5.6GHz, and 5.4GHz ...
24 cores, and 32 threads. Intel hasn’t made any big promises about better single-thread performance over previous generations this time, nor any promises of better multithread performance.
Results that may be inaccessible to you are currently showing.
Hide inaccessible results